1. Prepare a Bell pair
  2. Measure both in the same basis
  3. 00 or 11, ideally
Conceptual sequence, read left to right. Ideal example; hardware noise is omitted.

background

Look at the pair

An entangled pair has a joint state that cannot be written as a separate pure state for each qubit. In an ideal Bell-pair example, measuring both qubits in the computational basis produces 00 or 11 with equal probabilities. Each local result is random, but the pair agrees.

Sources: IBM Quantum Learning

background

Where the analogy stops

Two sealed envelopes with matching cards can also produce matching results. That single measurement pattern alone does not prove entanglement. Quantum correlations across different measurement choices distinguish the full experiment. Entanglement does not provide controllable faster-than-light messaging.

Sources: IBM Quantum Learning

Check your understanding

Do matching outcomes by themselves prove entanglement?

Reveal the answer

No. Classically correlated systems can match too. You need an appropriate test with more than that one measurement setting.

Sources and review scope

Source-linked. Editorial review: .

  1. Quantum information: multiple systems ↗

    IBM Quantum Learning · Accessed 2026-10-02

Next lesson: From physical qubits to logical qubits →

Keep exploring